BarronMR (August 14, 2008 at 4:15 pm)

Hi,I think I'd like to comment on this, having owned both. The turbo was a Rev3 with filter, decat, and single exit hks exhaust but no boost controller so maybe increase 1psi boost due to decat/exhaust, either way it felt like a 250+bhp mr2. And I now own the foxxxxxxystoat v6 :)Im know that in road conditions the v6 is slightly the more capable of the two cars I owned. And the speedo backs that view ;).Just my experience.Regards

camotec (June 21, 2008 at 11:57 am)

I am converting my MR2 with a 3vz-fe motor with the iron block and will be supercharging. but yeah NA V6 beats the stock turbo, but who has a stock turbo these days. however the response and sound of the V6 is oh soo good :)

hypercatjohn (June 15, 2008 at 5:20 pm)

oh god wow that sounds so amazinnnnnnng

shawtwin (June 12, 2008 at 2:52 am)

Nice WB !

CavEsk (June 9, 2008 at 6:01 am)

Your ignorant

F1FundsDotCom (May 29, 2008 at 2:21 am)

stock us mister two = slow but SOO easy to make fast. v6 is harder to make fast.

SW20genIII (May 28, 2008 at 4:41 am)

stock US turbo against v6, v6 is quicker. Gen III 3sgte found in the JDM MR2 turbo is faster than a v6 swapped MKII MR2 if neither are modified otherwise.car sounds great!

foxxxxxxystoat (May 21, 2008 at 7:40 am)

Stock turbo against the v6, v6 is quicker.Modded turbo would be quicker although from past experiance, my turbo went tits up after upping the boost !!

Murd0kTRD (May 14, 2008 at 4:22 am)

I would say it depends on your mechanical skills. I believe ultimately you can still run more boost on the 3sgte considering it has an iron block and the 1mz fe is all aluminum (not sure about the more recent models). But the 6 cyl weighs a whole 100lbs less so it's mostly personal preference + mechanical inclination and money

mr2mattw (May 13, 2008 at 2:49 pm)

sounds gr8!, got mr2 turbo myself, is v6 conversion quicker?