|
pajasa62 (October 2, 2008 at 9:32 am)
Sure you DON'T want to debate! Your knowledge is limited to conspiracy books, yet of course you start yapping about "research"!"Oswald's gun was non-functional" - Like the gun wasn't test-fired after!"No witness to Oswald fleeing Tippet" - Duuhh! Markam and Calloway ID'd him in a lineup, Benevides and 2 others picked up the shells that match his gun "to the exclusion of all others"!"Cops wanted Oz to flee so they could kill him" - He was paraded around repeatedly for the media BY POLICE!
reelanrock (October 1, 2008 at 11:26 pm)
Don't want to debate you cyber-folk, but eyewitnesses said two men shot Tippit, neither of whom looked like Oswald. Cops couldn't kill him in the theater because there were too many witnesses. His gun was non-functional, bent pin. No witness ID'd Oswald fleeing Tippit scene. What I posted was gospel, my man. You have sucked up propaganda. You need to do a tad of research and avoid MSM lies.I'm too busy to engage in cyber-debate. Cops wanted Oz to flee so they could kill him. But he didn't.
pajasa62 (October 1, 2008 at 8:13 pm)
So tell us, with all the witnesses that ID'd Oswald in the Tippet shooting, flight w/ gun in hand, the same gun that he pulled on cops in the theatre (and of course the cops DIDN'T kill him in the theatre even though he tried to shoot Officer MacDonald) would Oswald be stupid enough to hand off his gun (to someone no one else saw!) and flee the building that quickly?What you posted was utter NONSENSE!
reelanrock (September 14, 2008 at 11:57 pm)
Oswald took a taxi to Oak Cliff. It was someone else who killed Tippit. Oswald was told by Ruby to be at the theater and collect his pay for letting the kill-team into the Depository and helping them build the 'sniper's nest.' Witnesses saw him in the 2nd floor lunchroom as of 12:15 and afterward. Cops at the theater were planning to kill him, but there were too many witnesses.His discription went over the cop radio before Tippit was killed. Idea was to kill him at the Depository just after JFK
AyoWAREq452 (September 11, 2008 at 7:16 pm)
Wanna know you wanna know what�s behind these sexy long legs?fastsexfinder . com
bondurango (September 7, 2008 at 1:37 am)
Yeah, just keep on pitching the same old questions & ignore the answers & any questions thrown at you. Go ahead & call the answers selective knowledge but it beats no answers & no knowledge from you. You're such a whimp, you can't step up to the plate to support your claims or denials & answer ANY questions. All you can do is to keep on pitching questions & call it checkers. But everytime I jump your pieces, you try to sneak more pieces on the board. Whatever the game, you're still a cheater.
pajasa62 (September 7, 2008 at 12:15 am)
Classic of the conspiracy theorist. You can't get into a decent checkers game with them.After all my posts reflecting/challenging YOUR theory that YOU'RE promoting, your limited, selective knowledge on the subject catches up to you. What's left for you is trying to "save face" and act like this LSD experience of yours that "Tippet shot JFK" is somehow an accepted fact. Maybe pause for a second and wonder how all the other conspiracy theories don't pan out either!
bondurango (September 6, 2008 at 6:03 am)
Where's your narrative? You raised the issue but you have no comeback. In my book, that's a hit for me. Problem is, you keep on pitching even though you think I've struck out. If that's true, then it's my turn to pitch & your turn to step up to the plate & quit holding on to your tiny balls for dear life & defend your denials with real wood, i.e. evidence to support your denials. Otherwise, you'll have to admit that you're as laughable as Jack Ruby's dachshund, i.e. a real weener of a hotdog!
bondurango (September 6, 2008 at 5:20 am)
So my citation of official investigations is embellishment, eh? You think this woman in the video is me talking about Ruby hating RFK? What's your evidence her testimony is embellishment? Fact is, you'll ignore & deny any & all forms of evidence that implicates Ruby in JFK's assassination. Now, I've answered your questions, but your whiny ass is too scared to step up to the plate & answer mine & there's no bigger whimp than the one who is too chickenshit to face the opposition's pitching.
pajasa62 (September 6, 2008 at 4:22 am)
bondurangoI ask:Despite Oswald is destined to be sacrificed in this "plot" of yours, how is he NOT killed by a questioning officer (Tippet), NOR by cops arresting him as an armed suspect in killing a cop (this despite him pulling attempting to shoot Officer McDonald in the theatre and 3 arresting officers injured w/ a cut face and torn ligaments)If Oswald was to be sacrificed, you have alot of facts to ignore. And let's be clear here...THIS IS what happened. |
