|
suchasupernova (August 13, 2008 at 9:04 pm)
The Stone Roses were before Britpop started!
diegoveg1 (August 12, 2008 at 5:43 am)
the britpop music gift me some beautiful years of good band. i love blur and oasis and pulp!greetings from CHILE
jmillsxx (June 22, 2008 at 2:09 pm)
Ha ha whoever made this knows nothing about MUSIC, Stone Roses BRITPOP ha ha ha ha you having a laughGood effort though
Killerolching (May 26, 2008 at 9:01 pm)
A lot of misunderstanding here. The Stone Roses are not Britpop...Hacienda anyone? Radiohead aren't either; they are genuine musicians. Manics are of course not Britpop. That's the funniest suggestion I've heard in a while. Basically the only two serious musicians to have emerged from that white, middle class, male movement are Damon Albarn (Coxon was holding him back with his middle class whinging) and Jarvis Cocker (though he'd been around before the early ninetees). The rest was forgettable.
Killerolching (May 26, 2008 at 8:58 pm)
Manics and Britpop? Haha! They had something to say and produced avant-garde rock (The Holy Bible was the cut off point).
vieillecanaille (May 26, 2008 at 4:53 pm)
Suede and fuck the rest!
heyaevery1x (May 26, 2008 at 4:51 pm)
no, manics are the best, dude radiohead suck! and blur are good too...
heyaevery1x (May 26, 2008 at 4:49 pm)
sinc when were the manics brit pop!? they didnt agree with anything like that.. or even sound brit pop.... hey! great video though! :D great job!!
ScootyJustin (May 24, 2008 at 9:44 pm)
always?
will548 (May 8, 2008 at 4:26 am)
not including radiohead |
