|
shaver215 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
who says that Christ was an angel? JW's? Orthodox Xhristianity has never taught such non-sense. Gabriel never impregated Mary, he was just the messenger. Matt. 118 makes it clear that the Holy Spirit (God) made her pregnant with Jesus. Duh...
TruthAfterKnowledge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Greg, dear brother, TTAK is not a camp. Visit our Yahoo Group to see the doctrinal disagreements among the members of the group. Officially, we endorse the Virgin Birth, but we do not endorse the Perpetual Virginity of Mary (though one member does). We declare that Christ is the Lord God our Creator. We hold the High Holy days according to the Lunisolar calendar (Chanookah in late December, Passover in early April, etc). The sabbath corresponds with Friday sundown to Saturday sundown.
Greg879 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Give me a list that u guys preach, like mary is one of them and the sabbath is another, what else u guys try to claim?
AbuKhamr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
PROFIT, you're asking me if I looked at the Strong's definition? I did, and I wrote to you the following about half an hour ago: "indeed, sir, I do owe you an apology. [...] You are correct, Strong's is as you said. My apologies." Can you not see the text of that post? If not, click the link at the bottom of the screen which allows you to see all posts (and the post should have been sent to your e-mail as well).
Profit613 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ABU, ANSWER THIS: Did you take a look @ the strongs definition? I will assume you did since you are now using another red herring tactict by asking me about "The Scriptures ISR" translation using "according to the law".Answer: I haven't checked on that. It doesn't matter if there are other verses w/the same translation or not. YOU STILL WONT HUMBLE YOURSELF TO THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER.I've proven my case. And yes the Most High is dealing w/ me spiritually not Thayer. He got used by YHWH.
AbuKhamr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
PROFIT, I have to shrug my shoulders when you make this claim of knowing better than Thayer's. But, of course, I will re-ask my question: is there any other places where "The Scriptures ISR" translation puts "according to the law" in place nomizo?
AbuKhamr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
PROFIT, indeed, sir, I do owe you an apology. I accused you of misreading Strong's online, when it turns out I was the one doing that, and it seems the printed text I had before me last night was not actually Strong's (it listed the Strong's number at the top of the page, but proceeded, I guess to give a summary of Thayer's). From there I did a glancing Google search, and should have spent more than a half a second looking at the results. You are correct, Strong's is as you said. My apologies.
Profit613 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ABU, you sound ridiculous. Are u trying to say that I can't read or comprehend a definition. I've been at this thing for quite some time.I will send you the link right now. I never said that the definition didn't contain "from 3551" (which also adds support to the definition since it's the root word).After you read the definition will you bow down and admit the truth on this matter?
Profit613 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ABU, When we use a Dictionary we are only using them for the technical breakdowns for the meaning of words. Strong & Thayer were christians so their biblical understanding would be that of a christian. Thayer's does list the proper definition amongst others. Now if you were translating the scriptures it would be up to you to place the proper translation in it's proper location.Remember I'm not a kjv onlyist. I boast greater SCRIPTURAL knowledge than Thayer. This came from YHWH.
AbuKhamr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
PROFIT, I am mystified by this response from you. I am left wondering if perhaps you are misreading Strong's. Nonetheless, as you noted, Strong's can also be found online. Which site do you know of which gives "properly to do by law" as the definition for specifically nomizo (rather than nomos). In other words, which site has "properly to do by law" without "from 3551" before it?Also, are there any other verses in "The Scriptures" translation where nomizo is rendered "according to the law"? |
