|
icedragon94 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
boredom
ronuj (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that was stupid y didnt they just solve a 3x3 and not waste so much time and energy
redflame183 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol, there was a square 1 and rubik's revolution
crickit000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
well you don't see that everyday. lol.
tyroneborjas (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Wow pretty tedious job to solve the cube like that
dagurebenezer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
no!
gyc6001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
oh lol.
popeye0shing (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
its easy that u can make a 'axle' for it
arcticshaman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
nice 4 by 4's are difficult
KaiXevandStanley (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's not a solution of a 9x9x9. It's a solution of a 3x3x3. And a pretty pointless one. |
