|
Menathinius (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The answer is simple. Next protest, we need more Anons to show up than ever before.
hooptastic1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yeah! Chocolate milk solves everything.
Simanda (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Reminds me of the "no coloreds" signs. How come Subway let her do that? They should be overjoyed that Anonymous eats in their restaurants: they are many and they need to eat sometime.
MnJiman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is horrible.
ldude893 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
By the way, it's nice to see kids speak up for a change
ldude893 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
What's with Scientology, anyway? They keep saying that they can cure unhappiness, and here they are, violating the constitution
SupremeRulahXenu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm not too happy about seeing kids at political protests either, but what North did was simply inexcusable.
sunderlandchanology (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If Scientology doesn't want you to go to Subway... then you should complain to Subway. If Subway doesn't want you there, you shouldn't force them to take your money, simply go elsewhere!In other news, you do NOT TAKE YOUR CHILDREN TO PROTESTS! Scientology is dangerous and you should protext your children by not taking them!
shalindriaharam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Well, scientology is it's own worst advertising. I find it amazing that people pay so much money to be so looney. Who in their right mind treats little kids like that?
4G3NTanon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Moral-Trolls don't get it.Kids are MUCH smarter than given credit for.They should be allowed to evaluate a situation. As far as putting kids in peril goes. Hell, people send their kids to Jesus Camp, a mental rape-fest of kids minds.(Not a good thing) Besides, if the OSA would commit any violence to kids on camera,Scientology knows it would bring about theirown total destruction. |