|
garyzeyan (October 5, 2008 at 2:39 pm)
WRC car running gravel tyres, using high-ride height and softer gravel suspension is definitely unfair. gravel tyres also have lousy grip on tarmac. in comparison, the s2000 is running some sticky road tyres, with super low, and hard road suspension.
933661 (October 5, 2008 at 7:18 am)
グラベル仕様のＷＲカ－相手じゃんタ－マック仕様にしてレイン用タイヤ履いたら勝負にならんと思いますが・・・
thehighflyin12 (October 4, 2008 at 6:46 am)
how does a WRC EVO lose to a S2000 in the rain??? I am dumbfounded. AWD EVO-RWD S2000. Bad Drivers
fudgenubs (September 29, 2008 at 6:32 pm)
No wonder why that Mitsubishi did shit at WRC rallying, they can't even get the right setup. Even with the right setup there's not much to brag about if you beat a street spec S2000 with a £400,000+ rally car.
belgref (September 26, 2008 at 4:14 am)
thats not logical, its suppose to be faster on slik tires. you can see it by yourself the lancer is drifting too much, you can see theres no grip.
vicce88 (September 25, 2008 at 2:35 pm)
Hahaha the lancer will fuck the s2000 with same tyres and tarmac spec,
venturikennels (September 25, 2008 at 8:06 am)
try putting wider road race tires to the lancer and we'll see what'll happen.. :b
zepter00 (September 24, 2008 at 8:44 am)
WTF? Lancer WRC gravel specification? It's unfair!
azcheron (September 24, 2008 at 2:23 am)
harder isnt always better. It depends on the cars geometry. That lancer was made from day 1 as a rally car and is not setup for pure tarmac. If you want a tarmac monster, get HKS to bring their race car to the touge.
darknedfren (September 23, 2008 at 9:18 pm)
ignorant... soft suspension... hard is better suspension, and the tyres aren't sliks... |
