|
romansrule3 (September 1, 2008 at 10:24 am)
yeah but the end is really sad i thought they were gona make it out of there and i loved the camera guy sorry i gotta say this,this sis from the movie ''What is that!OH thats a terrible thing and then 5 mins later What is that!(again)Oh thats another terrible thing!
helloedlow (August 30, 2008 at 7:35 pm)
mepi67 is an artard.
helloedlow (August 30, 2008 at 7:34 pm)
actually the audio is really good quality and its not like recording a home video. and wat the hell do u mean by home video?? and btw u do see the monster u artard. this movie is a not a disaster, u just dont understand good movies.
WOLVESONFIRE (August 30, 2008 at 8:06 am)
wut are you talking about you do too see the monster
lbillison94 (August 25, 2008 at 5:56 pm)
would you like to borrow a dictionary before you comment?
aladrys (August 23, 2008 at 5:22 pm)
This movie was a piece of genius.You obviously didn't get the point if you were expecting to see the monster right off the bat, and the shaky camera angles were done on purpose. This was a brilliant movie! saw it twice in theatres!
bloodydragon (August 23, 2008 at 7:20 am)
YES IT DID
DyLbErT11 (August 22, 2008 at 8:19 pm)
Is sucks?...Fail
DyLbErT11 (August 22, 2008 at 8:18 pm)
ROFL!!!Brookland?...Brooklyn*
mepi67 (August 18, 2008 at 4:52 pm)
this movie is sucks dont ever rented, first u dont even see the monster and the audio from the movie is like when u record a home video , this movie is totally a desater |
