|
skipstops (August 15, 2008 at 3:35 pm)
Will this train retire soon?
freightgh0st (June 8, 2008 at 12:35 pm)
UP and BNSF share some trackage rights with each other, along with other rairloads...thats why you see UP trains on BNSF and BNSF on UP tracks sometimes
York22 (March 29, 2008 at 8:47 pm)
What a splendid sight. I wish steam locomotives still reigned supreme on America's railroads. What a sight it would be to see these rolling into small towns like Beacon. New York
Fiddleman200616 (March 10, 2008 at 12:53 am)
No i am not part of the crew :( But I do know a few of them personally. That would be neat to have that loco up here. That'd be a long way to travel.
joelpatricksimmons (March 10, 2008 at 12:00 am)
you part of engine crew on 4449 if you are what in honor to meet you union pacific want let cotton belt 819 run is bnsf bye's the up in arkansas we will be good to go lol
Fiddleman200616 (March 9, 2008 at 9:29 am)
Actually Joel, UP 844 & SP 4449 we running on BNSF trackage from Tacoma to Everett, Wa. on this trip. I am shocked that BNSF let UP bring their stuff up. 4449 has been up here numerous times in the past tho. She is a "regular". haha
SF3751 (March 2, 2008 at 3:03 pm)
Well.. you see here that it is running with a Union Pacific engine and train.
joelpatricksimmons (March 2, 2008 at 7:44 am)
hey how come 4449 get's track right's on the union pacific and cotton belt 819 can't that's not fair union pacific will not let cotton belt 819 run but they will let sp 4449
SF3751 (January 24, 2008 at 2:24 pm)
SP really blends in there. lol.
lvanciel (December 19, 2007 at 1:49 pm)
but a very good erie in my option always will give me goosebumps |