NotUnintelligent (August 27, 2008 at 9:39 pm)

I watched till 7:00. By then I saw 2 flaws:1. The first molten rocks solidified almost instantly since they landed in water.2. What about rocks that are forming today?

jesusLostChildren777 (August 17, 2008 at 6:56 am)

great video!!

imanerd36 (August 4, 2008 at 3:44 am)

Lets take a look a earth space science before we step into Pu Decay. These creationists are saying that the granite had to cool very fast(less than a second) and yet granite contains quartz, which as anyone that has taken geology would know quartz has to cool very slowly to archive it's crystal structure. So how could quartz that takes well over a year to form, form in under a second? For your theory to be true the quartz had to form in under a second which is impossible.Please respond.

ricaleigh007 (July 25, 2008 at 1:54 am)

Hahahaha. That is such a base argument. Whenever the Godless are beat they cry "Propaganda!" like that means absolutely anything.

iclb0028 (July 22, 2008 at 12:43 pm)

I can't believe the creationists are still repeating the Pu halos work as evidence of a young earth even following publication of an article by answers in genesis (one of their own orgs) in 2001, w w w . answersingenesis . o r g / tj / v15 / i1 / radiohalos . asp (remove spaces)Pu radiohalos were identified in granite plutons in Stone mountain, a "post flood" mountain (i.e. as claimed by creationists). This work casts very serious doubt on the value of Pu halos for predicting a young earth.

EvolutionaI (July 21, 2008 at 1:32 pm)

Unrefuted? I know it is a bit much to ask a creationist to keep abreast of current scientific findings, but it would be refreshing if they could keep up with their own literature. RATE research? A.A Snelling? Even the foremost creation geologist now asserts Po halos do not represent fiat granite creation. He even found some new Po halos in meta-arkose and gneiss. Metamorphic rocks! So I guess primordial granite has received its final nail. By a creationist no less!!

elgalloprieto (July 17, 2008 at 6:52 am)

it says page connot be found, send me the link in personal messege

elgalloprieto (July 17, 2008 at 6:48 am)

propaganda? This has been subject to peer review and published in many science journals, even to this day....pfft, propaganda

elgalloprieto (July 17, 2008 at 6:45 am)

nobody said it was a cartoon. only something with the qualities of a God. The idea of a god is very logical, we can discuss this whenever you want. just send me a personal messege.

elgalloprieto (July 17, 2008 at 6:44 am)

And what method of dating did they use?