|
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 7:05 pm)
I think women would stop having abortions naturally and even without any moral consideration (though few such people actually exist) when there are definitive options that are widely available as alternatives. If you aren't part of a movement to provide these, then you aren't going to prevent many abortions.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:57 pm)
If I'd have had a choice back then, I'm not sure if I'd had wanted to be born. I'm glad I didn't have that choice, in a way. Babies rights shouldn't have to do with their speculative choice, it should have to do with the fact that it is a person who cannot make that choice (and who should probably not be allowed to i.e. suicide), but who needs to be protected from someone else making a choice that interferes and ends their lives.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:48 pm)
Roe was used as a pawn in that case - if she had been shown more respect, maybe things would be different. I agree though that more resources need to be available to women.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:43 pm)
The weight of all of the suffering of the earth will have to be answered for, and besides through Jesus with the lives of those who believe in him, no one can answer for all of it. Focus on your attitude towards helping others, not condemning them, and more good will come of it. Those are the fruits.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:39 pm)
Are you joking, or does the irony of your comment escape you?
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:38 pm)
The weight of all of the suffering of the earth will have to be answered for, and besides through Jesus with the lives of those who believe in him, no one can answer for all of it. Focus on your attitude towards helping others, not condemning them, and more good will come of it. Those are the fruits. The women who have already had abortions need to be forgiven, and shown how they must avoid doing it again.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:30 pm)
I think there needs to be more resources available to these women. There really aren't. It's about you and the kids you already have surviving. Who can really support all of the babies? Ok, so that's a good reason for better contraceptives, perhaps, or better aid programs, but the chances of that?
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:28 pm)
The comment was about women who have already had the abortions.
MachineAmbition (July 25, 2008 at 6:25 pm)
What scares me a lot is when rape is considered as a reproductive strategy part of evolutionary development.
DeanClark68 (July 25, 2008 at 6:21 pm)
There are two things Planned Parenthood and Pro-choicers don't want to talk about. Margaret Sanger because she was a racist and believed in ethnic cleansing and how can some women kill there own child. |