|
mast3rm00se (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Realy good in studios and comercial photography, but not in nature and sport photography.Would be lovley if they made one onlo for that purpose trough :P
xtysonboswellx (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
... i still don't get it, aside from using your prints as wall paper what else makes this camera better than an slr?
BBnose (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I still remember the Xpan. Hope Hasselblade can redesign it into a digital version, a high quality small and light weight pro cam.
pstchaseki (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This is what I call ; GOD's camara
Anomlies (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Fuji provided the technology, it is actually a Fuji camera.
ronoskatealfaz (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That's such a ridiculous statement. The fact that the person buying a $38,000 stills camera shows that this person focuses solely on still photography. If you wanted a video camera, buy a video camera. Hasselblad make some of the world's best still photography cameras- built just for professionals- why would they want a stupid record setting?.....seriously, video would be last on their agenda.
2224612 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Something a lot of pros do is rent a camera for a specific job. There are two businesses where I work that rent high end equipment and the price is reasonable for this kind of soa gear. So, you get a chance to pursue a job, bid a daily, weekly or whatever period rental cost for camera and lens, buy a few memory cards, away you go. After you are done, take the equip back to the store and be on your way.
sclogse1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
At $38,000 clams, it should also do video.
sclogse1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Of course, it's also a tax write-off, but at these prices, I would start to look at pro high def motion picture cameras, as now you can get what Lucas is shooting with for around $12,000, and spend some on servers, etc.
likeawhispr (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You might prefer the Canon Mark3 because for what you shoot the Mark3 is more "practical", however if you did primarily studio work, with lots of cropping and post processing, the top of the line dslr are still in a lower league. The reason most people don't see medium or large format cameras being used for weddings is because most people can't afford it. Most expensive weddings have at least the portrait/posed photos shot with medium or large format cameras & use DSLR for the small stuff ;) |
